"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
11/25/2014 at 21:35 • Filed to: None | 1 | 9 |
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
I can deal with the interior of a bespoke car being ugly due to flamboyancy. But no Roller should ever have an interior that looks so boring. It looks like the interior of its corporate sibling the M5, which has a fine interior for an M5, but which doesn't belong in a Rolls-Royce.
BmanUltima's car still hasn't been fixed yet, he'll get on it tomorrow, honest.
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/25/2014 at 21:37 | 3 |
Needs some oak.
Vicente Esteve
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/25/2014 at 21:37 | 0 |
Carbon Fiber on the dash was the last thing anyone thought Rolls Royce would do
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> BmanUltima's car still hasn't been fixed yet, he'll get on it tomorrow, honest.
11/25/2014 at 21:37 | 0 |
Yes. Yes it does.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Vicente Esteve
11/25/2014 at 21:38 | 0 |
There's an excellent reason for that.
BmanUltima's car still hasn't been fixed yet, he'll get on it tomorrow, honest.
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/25/2014 at 21:39 | 1 |
Maybe a nice walnut burl.
Vicente Esteve
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/25/2014 at 21:40 | 1 |
It's useless.
And, I like vulgarity and all, such as the glass lit spirit of ecstasy, but this is just no.
Ramblin Rover - The Vivisector of Solihull
> Vicente Esteve
11/25/2014 at 21:50 | 2 |
It has to be vulgarity that was expensive *and* expensive to design and craft with paleolithic tools. AKA wood, yes. Bronze, gold, glass, or leather, yes. CF, hell to the fuck no.
My citroen won't start
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/25/2014 at 22:02 | 0 |
That is the reason why I like my Bentleys and Rolls square and pre-1990's
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> My citroen won't start
11/25/2014 at 22:13 | 0 |
Apart from the fact that this is the only modern Roller/Bentley I know of to have such treatment, and all the others still have a coffee table on the dash, you have a point.