"NaturallyAspirated" (NaturallyAspirated)
11/10/2014 at 13:52 • Filed to: Subarulopnik | 2 | 8 |
I figure that since I got 225,000 miles out of the original, I'll be happy if I get that out of the replacement.
Spoiler:
[Show]
[Hide]
It's the clutch fork.
With the new fork installed, the clutch feels better than it has in a while. I think the fork must have been on it's way out for quite some time.
It broke right on a weld. If you look at the picture of the back of both forks, you can see the broken on has a reinforcement plate welded in, while the new one does not. The new fork instead has taller sides. I guess Subaru figured out that the welded plate was a bad idea.
deekster_caddy
> NaturallyAspirated
11/10/2014 at 13:54 | 1 |
It's nice to see that a replacement part has been improved to address the original parts weakness! That doesn't always happen...
McMike
> NaturallyAspirated
11/10/2014 at 13:55 | 1 |
Aw man, I just saw the fork right before I read the spoiler!
MonkeePuzzle
> NaturallyAspirated
11/10/2014 at 13:58 | 0 |
clearly a bad design by subaru
http://oppositelock.jalopnik.com/yay-its-a-simp…
NaturallyAspirated
> MonkeePuzzle
11/10/2014 at 14:04 | 0 |
Yeah, in my Googling I had read breaking an arm off on the weld and wearing through the pivot were the two most common failure modes for the fork.
NaturallyAspirated
> McMike
11/10/2014 at 14:08 | 0 |
That's OK, you still get credit for it.
TheD0k_2many toys 2little time
> NaturallyAspirated
11/10/2014 at 22:03 | 0 |
Your trans seems to not be connected to the engine. I suspect that is where you issue lies.*
*TheD0k is not a licensed mechanic , and his diagnosis should not be taken seriously
NaturallyAspirated
> TheD0k_2many toys 2little time
11/11/2014 at 11:57 | 0 |
Well, the initial problem was that the engine was TOO connected to the transmission. Changing it so that the engine was not connected at all was the first step in fixing the issue.
TheD0k_2many toys 2little time
> NaturallyAspirated
11/11/2014 at 21:45 | 0 |
Damn i hate clingy trannies.....