"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
11/05/2014 at 16:09 • Filed to: None
2
5|
"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
11/05/2014 at 16:09 • Filed to: None | 2
| 5 |
Three with cars, one with a pedestrian. The worst part? 3 of them, including the pedestrian one, would've been my fault. Compound that with an incident on Saturday that should, by all accounts, have been a crash due to idiocy by me, and I'm amazed I haven't wrecked a car in the last week. Note to self: Be more cautious.
ACESandEIGHTS
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/05/2014 at 16:12 |
|
I caught myself slipping one day, started turning shit around. Now: drive with one hand? Not if I can help it. Tailgate? No. Assume? No.
All I've got to get under control completely is the cell phone.
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> ACESandEIGHTS
11/05/2014 at 16:14 |
|
I never text and drive, and only talk and drive when absolutely necessary.
All five of these were due to conscious, stupid decisions with my hands on the wheel and my eyes and brain focused.
For Sweden
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/05/2014 at 16:30 |
|
Don't try to lane split with a van, mkay?
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> For Sweden
11/05/2014 at 16:32 |
|
I would. If I had a van.
Jordan and the Slowrunner, Boomer Intensifies
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/05/2014 at 17:38 |
|
I think to myself every time I get into a car, would I want to be on the road with myself? Usually it's a yes.