"Anon" (tjsielsistneb)
10/25/2014 at 19:13 • Filed to: None
5
10|
"Anon" (tjsielsistneb)
10/25/2014 at 19:13 • Filed to: None | 5
| 10 |
I can't wait till I can get a faster lens, only being able to shoot at f/3.5 doesn't work for street photography.
ttyymmnn
> Anon
10/25/2014 at 19:19 |
|
f/3.5 isn't that far from f/2.8. Unless you're looking for f/1.4. But I, too, have experienced the regret. I shot out at Dyess AFB yesterday, fantastic conditions. But I didn't trust my light and shot at 400 when 100 would have done. All the shots are noisy and grainy.
Jonathan Harper
> Anon
10/25/2014 at 19:20 |
|
show us the best one
|
Anon
> ttyymmnn
10/25/2014 at 19:29 |
|
I'm buying a voigtlander 1.4 35mm for my sony a7 rig that I've been saving up for. Also the noise performance on my Canon 450D is mediocre to put it nicely, anything past 200 iso looks like you're seeing the picute on an 80's tv. So bumping up the iso really isn't an option either.
BaconSandwich is tasty.
> ttyymmnn
10/25/2014 at 19:46 |
|
The depth of field at f/1.4 is really really narrow - especially for taking pictures of an entire car.
The noise thing probably doesn't help. That was going to be my next suggestion - up the ISO. A grainy picture is probably going to be better than a blurry picture.
|
Anon
> Jonathan Harper
10/25/2014 at 19:59 |
|
Probably this one.
Xyl0c41n3
> Anon
10/25/2014 at 22:06 |
|
Mind if I try my hand at a little editing?
|
ttyymmnn
> Anon
10/25/2014 at 23:00 |
|
Are you shooting moving cars, or posed cars?
|
Anon
> Xyl0c41n3
10/26/2014 at 02:19 |
|
why not?
|
Xyl0c41n3
> Anon
10/26/2014 at 03:02 |
|
Brought out the man and the little kid a little bit, brought down the glare from the tents, fixed some of the camera shake, cropped it in a little to remove some of the peripheral distractions, and warmed it up just slightly because I prefer warm B&W versus cool B&W. I noticed you shot at 1/60th of a second. That was just a smidge too slow... that's why the photo was a little unfocused. From camera shake from your hands. Try shooting at 1/90th next time, or faster. Especially on a sunny day like that. I don't know what your aperture was since you were in aperture priority and it doesn't say, but based on the DOF, I'm thinking somewhere around f /8, at least, especially with such a slow shutter speed. Anyway, what do you think?
|
Anon
> Xyl0c41n3
10/26/2014 at 11:59 |
|
I think it looks good! Also I was shooting at f/8 because I was out shooting in the sunlight.