"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
10/21/2014 at 20:55 • Filed to: None | 2 | 11 |
Vicente Esteve
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/21/2014 at 20:55 | 0 |
Rather have Armada
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Vicente Esteve
10/21/2014 at 20:56 | 0 |
....your loss.
Vicente Esteve
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/21/2014 at 21:04 | 0 |
bu, but, BOSE
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Vicente Esteve
10/21/2014 at 21:16 | 0 |
This has Bang & Olufsen.
Logansteno: Bought a VW?
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/21/2014 at 21:18 | 0 |
What a hideous rear end...
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Logansteno: Bought a VW?
10/21/2014 at 21:19 | 0 |
It's not that bad.
Logansteno: Bought a VW?
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/21/2014 at 21:21 | 0 |
You did not just help your point.
I think it's mostly the tail lights. They look out of place.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Logansteno: Bought a VW?
10/21/2014 at 21:21 | 0 |
My only problem is the vent in the bottom. The lights are okay with me.
Alex B
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/21/2014 at 21:28 | 0 |
Do want. Don't judge.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Alex B
10/21/2014 at 21:36 | 1 |
So do I. I don't do goodnight posters of cars I dislike.
Nerd-Vol
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/21/2014 at 21:59 | 0 |
nice. We have a white 2013 450. I am growing to love it!