![]() 11/25/2013 at 16:08 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() 11/25/2013 at 16:09 |
|
I'm going to go with "terrible."
![]() 11/25/2013 at 16:12 |
|
![]() 11/25/2013 at 16:13 |
|
Because why use a ute body with even the tiniest hints of curves, amiright?
![]() 11/25/2013 at 16:15 |
|
either on their own are awesome, not so much together unfortunately. Maybe if it was executed better
![]() 11/25/2013 at 16:16 |
|
Awesomely Terrible. The only solace I would have is that the front bodywork came off a wrecked or totally unusable car...so they found some use somewhere. But I would think they should go to a perfectly good car that is missing the body pieces!
![]() 11/25/2013 at 16:52 |
|
Body panel gaps are spot on for GM bodies of that era. Looks legit.
![]() 11/25/2013 at 20:05 |
|
I like the idea in principle, but the execution definitely needs work.
Perhaps if the bullet-nose was lower by about four to five inches, and the hood lowered accordingly...
![]() 11/27/2013 at 23:18 |
|