![]() 11/01/2013 at 06:32 • Filed to: Ferrari 458, Tuning, Liberty Walk, 458, SEMA | ![]() | ![]() |
Yep, this is a 458 with bolt on fenders and a ducktail spoiler. It was designes by Liberty Works (LB) and just got ready in time for SEMA. I belive these are the same guys who designes the fenders for the BRZ/FRS/GT86.
I must say that I really really like the rear view. It reminds me of the 458 GTE cars, but the non-GT wing spoiler makes it seem lower and kinda smooth.
The front view is a different story. Doesn't work that well for me, there seems something off and it can't match the great rear, although thats how I feel about 458s in general.
So what does the Opponation think? Yay or Nay? Would you do this to your Fezza before it eventually finds a fiery death?
For more pics and in depth infos head over to
!!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!
.
![]() 11/01/2013 at 06:35 |
|
Nay. It might be the whole point of the package, but those bolted on fender flares look cheap. Not a word I would want associated with my $300k Ferrari.
![]() 11/01/2013 at 06:40 |
|
The 458 is not a Japanese car. The bolt-on, with the camber and the flush tire is something very Japanese. Therefore I don't like this. More of this please:
![]() 11/01/2013 at 06:43 |
|
Fair, but don't forget that even if its ugly, negative camber can do wonders for the handling of a car...as long as its not an excessive amount, anyways.
The tuck is a different story.
![]() 11/01/2013 at 06:45 |
|
Funny you say that, the GT3 and GrandAm Version of the 458 has real bolt on fenders in the rear:
![]() 11/01/2013 at 07:02 |
|
One hopes that there are at least a few people who don't care how expensive their ferrari looks. ;)
![]() 11/01/2013 at 07:02 |
|
I love it, but I'm partial to the functional look of bolt-on fender flares. That said, get rid of the camber on the rear, give it an inch more of travel in the front (two in the back) and it's a 458 I would be willing to drive.
![]() 11/01/2013 at 07:03 |
|
Funny, I got the distinct impression of a race car's fitment. The tuck is maybe a little more, and the camber's a little excessive, but it's not completely out of place.
![]() 11/01/2013 at 07:39 |
|
these bolt-ons look way better than the ones pictured above.
![]() 11/01/2013 at 09:20 |
|
i like it... when you go wide body why are you still increasing the camber like an idiot? run proper camber on a wide body and you're golden.
side question: when you bolt on fenders, it is really just the industrial look they're going for, right? you still have to cut a ton of sheet metal away underneath so the tires will clear... right? i'm curious what the fender well looks like with bolt on fenders.
![]() 11/01/2013 at 09:29 |
|
You had me with that first picture (dat spoiler!), and lost me with the second. I agree - for my tastes, there's something just not quite "right" with the overall package.
![]() 11/01/2013 at 09:31 |
|
Maybe if it were a track car only but it looks chintzy. Those pop riveted flairs do nothing to make the car look better. Would much rather have the OEM catfish look.
![]() 11/01/2013 at 09:35 |
|
I'll have to get back to you. Can't make up my mind. I see one view and I'm all, "yeah, this could work". Then, a different picture and it's, " Yeachhhh, just threw up a little in my mouth ". So, basically what I'm saying is that I need a few more cups of coffee to get the sleep out of my eyes.
![]() 11/01/2013 at 09:56 |
|
The camber issue in the side-pic is an illusion created by the tuck and the lighting/shadows from that perspective. If you look at the rear tire in the top pic you can see that the camber isn't excessive at all.
![]() 11/01/2013 at 10:42 |
|
GIVE IT TO ME NOWWWWWWW
![]() 11/01/2013 at 11:00 |
|
I call this the "Aston-Martin-Centennial-Effect". I feel this way everytime I look at it, it's always 50/50 between pure love or disgust.
![]() 11/01/2013 at 11:03 |
|
Yep, the fenders are cut so you can fit the bigger tires and/or lower the car.
![]() 11/01/2013 at 11:04 |
|
I certainly looks better than the 458 Speciale. And I agree on the stance, I could live with the camber but that super low suspension kills it.
![]() 11/01/2013 at 11:09 |
|
look at that good camber! why did they ruin that. :(
how much of the fender is cut though? all the way up to where it bolts on?
![]() 11/01/2013 at 12:00 |
|
I think it is cut a bit below to ensure a good fitment of the fender on the side panel.
The good news about the camber is that i can be saved apparentley. Maybe they just dropped the suspension to some kind of show setting.
![]() 11/01/2013 at 12:04 |
|
As the owner of a slammed car with camber (or car previously modified as such, at least - I have since remedied it), camber is not something you can live with. Visually you may be content (I liked the look, visually) but driving a vehicle with even a little aesthetic camber (not including race cars adjusted for cornering stability, which is often barely noticeable) is awful at any speed over 45. Try to do a pull (or just accelerate) and the car swerves across the road and it's impossible to predict where it wants to go. And it's not ride quality but chassis/engine height that proves an issue - you have to constantly drive slow enough to avoid any bump greater than two inches (for my car - you could lean an iPhone on the oil pan - and probably five for the Ferrari) in the road.
![]() 11/01/2013 at 12:43 |
|
I feel like it would look better with smooth lines and the bolt holes filled in.
![]() 11/08/2013 at 11:23 |
|
Don't know why but this works.
![]() 11/08/2013 at 19:26 |
|
I think it looks -much- better with this kit; it definitely has too much camber, but overall it looks much more aggressive, which is something I think most modern supercars lack.