![]() 10/28/2013 at 23:30 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
HammerheadFistpunch/J Walter Weatherman bait.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 23:32 |
|
You sound like you don't want it...
![]() 10/28/2013 at 23:32 |
|
I saw something similar to that recently and I thought that the raised air intake was just the best touch.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 23:36 |
|
Snorkels...
mmmyyesss
![]() 10/28/2013 at 23:40 |
|
Sorry, I don't dive. Raised intake to me. :)
![]() 10/28/2013 at 23:41 |
|
Beautiful.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 23:44 |
|
You should - it's beautiful down there.
"down where?"
.
.
.
DOWN THERE
![]() 10/28/2013 at 23:44 |
|
The want is strong.
![]() 10/28/2013 at 23:56 |
|
Sorry, me a desert boy. Grew up on/near the Great Lakes. Had a few bad experiences there. Me stay dry now. :)
![]() 10/29/2013 at 01:28 |
|
expo uz100's are hot stuff. aint no lie. its amazing how stupid expenisve all that add on is.
lift kit - $1000
ARB front bumper - $1000
ARB rear bumper (assuming tire carrier) $1500
Snorkle - $400
Roof rack - $750
Awning - $300
Winch - $600
Tires - ~$1000
Sliders - $800
So your looking at over $7300 in retail ad ons, before labor. or roughly $1000 more than what I paid for my FZJ80. Its a costly affair.
![]() 10/29/2013 at 08:19 |
|
So I assume the IFS isn't as bad as people make it out to be
![]() 10/29/2013 at 11:35 |
|
The problem with the 100 series is that the lower arms would crack because the bump stops were too short. Raise the suspension, get new stops and enjoy. It was designed with the goal of the same articulation as the 80 series solids front axle. Its a bit of a misleading statement though, since the 3 link front axle on the 80's never really flexed too well anyway (at least compared to the rear)
But yeah, people generally consider the 100 a better expo vehicle because its smoother, more powerful and just as reliable and you don't really need a ton of articulation in expeditions anyway. Be careful installing front lockers though, the diff carrier is a little weaker in the 100 than the 80
@3:45