![]() 10/10/2013 at 19:27 • Filed to: dots, fiat, 500l | ![]() | ![]() |
...look weird in pictures but better in person? This is not one of those cars.
![]() 10/10/2013 at 19:28 |
|
Are you in a hurry or something? You forgot to post a picture and spelled "look" wrong! :)
![]() 10/10/2013 at 19:30 |
|
Damn mobile Kinja
![]() 10/10/2013 at 19:33 |
|
That explains a lot. (been there done that)
![]() 10/10/2013 at 19:35 |
|
And the goddamn mobile editor doesn't show whether or not your pic attached.
![]() 10/10/2013 at 19:59 |
|
They should have just give us the regular Panda.
![]() 10/10/2013 at 20:06 |
|
Yup. Saw one at the auto show earlier this year and couldn't get over how ugly and out of proportion it is.
![]() 10/10/2013 at 21:08 |
|
It probably handles like it looks too.
Like a fat pig.
C'mon Fiat, you can do better. Did Chrysler somehow make you build this?
![]() 10/10/2013 at 21:20 |
|
So, Automatch, I read your interesting Q&A. The car above then would be your answer if you had a customer that said:
"I really like how cute that little Fiat 500 looks. And isn't it Italian? My shoes are Italian! Does it come in four doors? And higher off the ground, so it's easier to get and out of? And I can, like, see more ahead of me? I don't really care about handling and power and stuff like that. Did you say it's based off the Panda? Oh I love Pandas! squeal "
![]() 10/10/2013 at 21:31 |
|
Ha!
![]() 10/10/2013 at 22:19 |
|
Actually from this angle I feel like i almost like it. I saw one in person on the other side of the interstate and got the same impression. It was white, too, so maybe different colors could be more appealing?