by "Supreme Chancellor and Glorious Leader SaveTheIntegras" (jegoingout)
Published 11/22/2017 at 15:48
by "Supreme Chancellor and Glorious Leader SaveTheIntegras" (jegoingout)
Published 11/22/2017 at 15:48
No Tags
STARS: 1
This though is rather disappointing to see.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
"Dasupersprint - base trim is enough" (dasupersprint)
11/22/2017 at 15:54, STARS: 0
Do we have the 0 to 60 times? Cars are getting really fast these days with less power
"interstate366, now In The Industry" (interstate366)
11/22/2017 at 16:08, STARS: 1
I’m very surprised it wasn’t underrated.
"interstate366, now In The Industry" (interstate366)
11/22/2017 at 16:09, STARS: 1
Faster to 60 than both the old Accord V6 and the new Camry V6.
"SnapUndersteer, Italian Spiderman" (dasborgen)
11/22/2017 at 16:10, STARS: 0
Strange..... Redline Reviews did V6 auto vs 2.0T auto rolls and the latter consistently won....which is what R&T here seems to corroborate
Although the 2.0T always pulled half a car or so at the beginning of every 40mph roll, the V6 crushed it in short order, usually well before the speedometers hit 60. In a traditional 40-120 roll, the new car wouldn’t be within shouting distance of the old one’s taillights.
"Dasupersprint - base trim is enough" (dasupersprint)
11/22/2017 at 16:21, STARS: 0
Well, there you go
"Discerning" (discerning2003c5z)
11/22/2017 at 16:44, STARS: 3
That seems to say that the 2.0t is SLOWER than the V6. Considerably slower.
"Textured Soy Protein" (texturedsoyprotein)
11/22/2017 at 17:01, STARS: 0
Ehh, I can’t say this upsets me greatly. The 2.0T loses some soul vs. the V6 but it at least is dynoing at a number in line with its rating from Honda.
"random001" (random001)
11/22/2017 at 17:17, STARS: 1
I agree.
"RacinBob" (racinbob)
11/22/2017 at 17:19, STARS: 0
True but the turbo will show substantially more torque beterrn 3000 and 4500 which is where most people drive. Unless you are actually doing a drag race, my bet is Joe consumer will consider the turbo to be the stronger motor.
"wafflesnfalafel" (wafflesnfalafel1)
11/22/2017 at 17:22, STARS: 0
Hmmm... reviews and test results seem to be bouncing all over, not a good sign. I wonder if they are having build consistency issues on that Accord spec motor? More sensitive to bad fuel? Temp changes? Sounds a bit like what Ford went through with the 4.6 modular back in the day - sounded cool, but wasn’t consistently making the go as designed.
"Tekamul" (tekamulburner)
11/22/2017 at 18:06, STARS: 0
Everything about that chart and their write up says they never got it to pull right on the dyno. Almost certainly the combination of an auto transmission, and intrusive software. It was running well below expected torque in the low RPMs, and wouldn’t go near redline, then lit the dashboard up like a Christmas tree.
I’m going to hold my opinion for a less tumultuous run.
"themanwithsauce - has as many vehicles as job titles" (themanwithsauce)
11/22/2017 at 18:11, STARS: 1
Your statement makes it sound like the 2.0 is faster but the quote you used states that the V6 was faster after 40...