Mercedes Benz AMG 280GE 5.6

Kinja'd!!! by "pip bip - choose Corrour" (hhgttg69)
Published 11/10/2017 at 23:09

Tags: AMG ; mercedes benz ; 280GE 5.6
STARS: 2


Kinja'd!!!

Kinja'd!!!

!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!

o_0


Replies (11)

Kinja'd!!! "Steve in Manhattan" (blogenfreude01)
11/10/2017 at 23:15, STARS: 1

Es ist scheußlich

Kinja'd!!! "pip bip - choose Corrour" (hhgttg69)
11/10/2017 at 23:20, STARS: 0

so much class in those pics.

;)

Kinja'd!!! "unclevanos (Ovaltine Jenkins)" (unclevanos)
11/10/2017 at 23:24, STARS: 1

Scheiße

Kinja'd!!! "WilliamsSW" (williamssw)
11/10/2017 at 23:37, STARS: 1

Wow it would hold a lot of cocaine.

And I would need a lot of cocaine to be seen in it

Kinja'd!!! "farscythe - makin da cawfee!" (farscythe)
11/10/2017 at 23:39, STARS: 2

holy shit dude...... thats a mercedes trump.... and you posted it with no warning whatsoever..

you monster

Kinja'd!!! "pip bip - choose Corrour" (hhgttg69)
11/10/2017 at 23:50, STARS: 1

shock therapy

;)

Kinja'd!!! "farscythe - makin da cawfee!" (farscythe)
11/10/2017 at 23:57, STARS: 0

Kinja'd!!!

lol

Kinja'd!!! "farscythe - makin da cawfee!" (farscythe)
11/11/2017 at 00:59, STARS: 0

also as aparantly me thing today is giving people unwanted music....have some old geezer chiefs

!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!

Kinja'd!!! "Hoccy" (Hoccy)
11/11/2017 at 04:10, STARS: 1

Still more tasteful than most of todays modifications

Kinja'd!!! "Rainbow" (rainbeaux)
11/11/2017 at 10:11, STARS: 0

I’m not going to lie; I love this. I’d daily it to hell and back.

Kinja'd!!! "AuthiCooper1300" (rexrod)
11/12/2017 at 09:29, STARS: 0

I think someone didn’t get their dates right.

Until the 90s AMG was just a company which specialised in souped-up versions of Mercedes-Benz cars, but they were not part of Daimler-Benz or Mercedes-Benz.

Mercedes-Benz and AMG did not start formally working together until 1993; and Mercedes (or rather, Daimler-Chrysler) did not acquire a controlling interest in AMG until the end of that decade.

Can anyone imagine Bruno Sacco signing-off such an “aesthetic improvement”?