by "The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock" (jukesjukesjukes)
Published 07/16/2017 at 00:42
by "The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock" (jukesjukesjukes)
Published 07/16/2017 at 00:42
No Tags
STARS: 2
Some day, once I can afford the maintenance.
It looks so menacing. It’s big barge, the automatic is acceptable.
"415s30 W123TSXWaggoIIIIIIo ( •_•))°)" (415s30)
07/16/2017 at 01:14, STARS: 0
For me that is a car where an engine swap is acceptable. Keep the rest.
"pip bip - choose Corrour" (hhgttg69)
07/16/2017 at 01:24, STARS: 0
hellcat swap!
"Chan - Mid-engine with cabin fever" (superchan7)
07/16/2017 at 01:26, STARS: 1
Has anyone done a financial case study of LS-swapping this vs. maintaining the original powertrain?
"The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock" (jukesjukesjukes)
07/16/2017 at 01:32, STARS: 0
I was thinking of 392 hemi more then a LS.
"My bird IS the word" (mybirdistheword)
07/16/2017 at 02:02, STARS: 0
I think the air suspension is more the problem here.
"Manwich - now Keto-Friendly" (manwich)
07/16/2017 at 09:22, STARS: 0
"Whistler13" (whistler13)
07/16/2017 at 09:40, STARS: 0
It’s hydraulic, and not a problem, nor is the engine or trans for that matter.
"dogisbadob" (dogisbadob)
07/16/2017 at 13:59, STARS: 0
they’ve been done all the time, and the LS/SBC is always cheaper
Same with the V12 Jags and a bunch of other European cars that used the Chevy Suburban transmission