by "aberson Bresident of the FullyAssed Committe" (emaxxbl)
Published 06/06/2017 at 17:14
by "aberson Bresident of the FullyAssed Committe" (emaxxbl)
Published 06/06/2017 at 17:14
No Tags
STARS: 8
I can only assume the British don’t take wars seriously
"Rusty Vandura - www.tinyurl.com/keepoppo" (rustyvandura)
06/06/2017 at 17:35, STARS: 0
Right. Case in point: the Rolls Royce Merlin engine...
"Cé hé sin" (michael-m-mouse)
06/06/2017 at 17:39, STARS: 0
Yes, the Alvis Scimitar and its various derivatives used the Jag 4.2.
"PS9" (PS9)
06/06/2017 at 18:12, STARS: 4
Should have used something more reliable from Japa-err...oh.
Hawkwaaard...
"BritishLeyland™" (leylandcars)
06/06/2017 at 18:54, STARS: 3
Just because you’re at war doesn’t mean you can’t appreaciate impeccable refinement and effortless mid-range torque...
"Svend" (svend)
06/06/2017 at 19:15, STARS: 1
It looks Spartan without the engine in it.
Also. When I get home I’ll be watching the restoration on this tank. It’s on Youtube.
"SilentButNotReallyDeadly...killed by G/O Media" (silentbutnotreallydeadly)
06/06/2017 at 19:49, STARS: 1
Actually they do. The economics of same engine and many platforms is used the world over these days. Cheap engineering, cheap war.
VW have more recently taken it to its logical extreme with same engine in same platform to make many variants...
"Distraxi's idea of perfection is a Jagroen" (distraxi)
06/07/2017 at 03:25, STARS: 0
Yep, they do. They just go for quantity not quality:
"Svend" (svend)
06/07/2017 at 04:35, STARS: 1
You’ve got to check out some of Paul Donovan’s YouTube videos on this vehicle.
Going to the petrol station.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
"jimz" (jimz)
06/07/2017 at 15:24, STARS: 0
Tank engine, you say? how about bunging together five Chrysler flathead sixes?
"aberson Bresident of the FullyAssed Committe" (emaxxbl)
06/07/2017 at 15:31, STARS: 0
so american