by "Deal Killer - Powered by Focus" (dealkiller-ii)
Published 05/31/2017 at 20:55
by "Deal Killer - Powered by Focus" (dealkiller-ii)
Published 05/31/2017 at 20:55
No Tags
STARS: 3
I saw one of these today driving around town.
It was, interesting, to say the least. Extremely low, and the headlights didn’t quite look right, as they were very small, as the driver had them up while he was driving. Probably so people would notice such a low car. Not sure if I’d want to spend the several $10,000's in order to make such a beast.
"Chariotoflove" (chariotoflove)
05/31/2017 at 21:21, STARS: 0
I love those cars. It makes me sad to think people might mess with perfection.
"If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent" (essextee)
05/31/2017 at 22:08, STARS: 2
I think I’m alone in thinking the regular window looks better than the split.
"Steve in Manhattan" (blogenfreude01)
05/31/2017 at 22:20, STARS: 0
Is that what I think it is ...?
"Deal Killer - Powered by Focus" (dealkiller-ii)
05/31/2017 at 22:38, STARS: 1
Yes, it is a car..
"MarquetteLa" (marquettela)
05/31/2017 at 23:07, STARS: 1
I came across this non-split window today.
"Brian McKay" (brianmckay)
06/01/2017 at 00:17, STARS: 0
You’re not the only person who thinks that an unobstructed view is preferable.
"kanadanmajava1" (kanadanmajava1)
06/01/2017 at 08:37, STARS: 0
From that view and in that color it looks very nice. But it seems to an illusion after I looked at other pictures.
"Meatcoma" (mastapoof)
06/01/2017 at 09:36, STARS: 0
That looks like a 63 body on a mid 2000's frame. Looks like the windows and top is a newer body style and the body is a 63. Looks good but odd.
The front window has too much rake for the year. and no way would those fat tires fit under the fenders in the back without some modification.
"Deal Killer - Powered by Focus" (dealkiller-ii)
06/01/2017 at 12:35, STARS: 1
Yep, it’s a C-6 ‘Vette with new body panels. You can look up the company that does this conversion. It is not cheap.