by "leicester" (leicester)
Published 05/18/2017 at 02:05
by "leicester" (leicester)
Published 05/18/2017 at 02:05
Tags: Photography
STARS: 13
Came across my FB feed:
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
"facw" (facw)
05/18/2017 at 02:14, STARS: 4
This is very cool. Unfortunately my tired mind misassembled the title and now I’m disappointed that this story doesn’t have any Starfighters.
"PS9" (PS9)
05/18/2017 at 02:21, STARS: 0
...how can a 100+ year old camera still shoot photos? It can’t. UNLESS HE USED HIS TIME MACHINE TO GO BUY A CAMERA 100 YEARS AGO AND IT’S ACTUALLY ONLY DAYS TO WEEKS OLD IN OUR TIME
"Berang" (berang)
05/18/2017 at 02:29, STARS: 1
I’ve seen this story now a few times, being a photographer, and it is so annoying that they misidentify the camera as a “view camera” when it is a single lens reflex.
BTW, such cameras used to be used extensively for sports and action photography, albeit with a much longer lens:
https://gizmodo.com/this-huge-camera-rig-was-the-howitzer-of-early-action-p-1565650523
"promoted by the color red" (whenindoubtflatout)
05/18/2017 at 02:51, STARS: 3
I love this one.
"Rustholes-Are-Weight-Reduction" (rustholes-are-weight-reduction)
05/18/2017 at 02:52, STARS: 1
BRB, looking for an old camera
"KnowsAboutCars" (knowsaboutcars)
05/18/2017 at 03:44, STARS: 0
Cool.
"LongbowMkII" (longbowmkii)
05/18/2017 at 06:35, STARS: 1
That sounds like it’d leave a nasty wound.
"boredalways" (boredalway666)
05/18/2017 at 08:05, STARS: 1
"S65" (granthp)
05/18/2017 at 09:30, STARS: 1
???
"facw" (facw)
05/18/2017 at 09:33, STARS: 1
Much better.