The E-type doesn't hold a candle to the 2000GT 

Kinja'd!!! by "AestheticsInMotion" (aestheticsinmotion)
Published 05/06/2017 at 03:44

Tags: Jaguar ; Toyota ; 2000gt ; E-Type
STARS: 12


Kinja'd!!!

That is all.

[edit] okay I’ll admit, the E type certainly has the better interior.


Replies (19)

Kinja'd!!! "TheHondaBro" (wwaveform)
05/06/2017 at 03:50, STARS: 0

I agreed with you until the interior part. Yamaha piano wood is best interior trim.

Kinja'd!!! "AestheticsInMotion" (aestheticsinmotion)
05/06/2017 at 04:01, STARS: 1

Don’t get me wrong, I love them both and it’s pretty cool toyotatapped their piano division for the project.

Kinja'd!!!

But come one... Look at this! The switch craft, the gauges, the steering wheel... Drool

Kinja'd!!! "MultiplaOrgasms" (themightymultipla)
05/06/2017 at 04:47, STARS: 3

Volvo FMX.

Kinja'd!!!

Kinja'd!!! "pip bip - choose Corrour" (hhgttg69)
05/06/2017 at 04:52, STARS: 1

Gib!

Kinja'd!!! "BiTurbo228 - Dr Frankenstein of Spitfires" (biturbo228)
05/06/2017 at 05:01, STARS: 1

As a Brit...I have to agree with you. The 2000GT is utterly perfect.

Kinja'd!!! "RT" (rt-p)
05/06/2017 at 06:09, STARS: 0

I’d disagree, because the E-Type has a driving experience to back up its looks.

From the outside though, it’s hard to decide which one looks better.

Kinja'd!!! "If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent" (essextee)
05/06/2017 at 06:31, STARS: 0

Of course it can’t hold a candle to the Toyota, it has no hands!

Kinja'd!!! "JR1" (type35bugatti)
05/06/2017 at 07:55, STARS: 0

Coupe yes. Convertible no

Kinja'd!!! "Viggen" (viggen37)
05/06/2017 at 08:35, STARS: 0

Disagree because when I think E-Type, I think Series I convertible

Kinja'd!!! "Turbineguy: Nom de Zoom" (will-alib)
05/06/2017 at 08:42, STARS: 2

That’s one of those classic cars that deserves a mold splashed off of it to make replicas.

Kinja'd!!! "Alfalfa" (alfalfa-romeo)
05/06/2017 at 09:26, STARS: 1

The Toyota is also worth about ten times more, soooo...

Kinja'd!!! "G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3" (gbodyman)
05/06/2017 at 11:01, STARS: 4

Kinja'd!!!

The E-Type Low Drag Coupe is thicc, tho.

Kinja'd!!! "TheHondaBro" (wwaveform)
05/06/2017 at 11:24, STARS: 1

Kinja'd!!!

Yeah but the 2000GT looks like it was put together by people who knew what they were doing.

Kinja'd!!! "Distraxi's idea of perfection is a Jagroen" (distraxi)
05/06/2017 at 11:33, STARS: 1

Depends a lot on the viewing angle. In side view, and particularly ahead of the windscreen, I’m inclined to agree with you, though the E type can be helped a lot by increasing the track.

Front and rear view though, the Jag wins hands down: the detailing on the Toyota is flat-out ugly.

Kinja'd!!!

Kinja'd!!!

Kinja'd!!!

Kinja'd!!!

Kinja'd!!! "C62030" (c62030)
05/06/2017 at 13:05, STARS: 1

The E-Type doesn’t hold a candle to a disfigured snake.

Kinja'd!!! "AestheticsInMotion" (aestheticsinmotion)
05/06/2017 at 13:46, STARS: 0

Damn. That’s sexy. I was getting kind of annoyed by the seemingly endless variations of E-type haha

Kinja'd!!! "AestheticsInMotion" (aestheticsinmotion)
05/06/2017 at 13:47, STARS: 0

They’re both so far out of reach for the average person I felt price was pretty irrelevant

Kinja'd!!! "NJAnon" (NJAnon)
05/07/2017 at 01:22, STARS: 0

I have no personal admiration interest in either car, but I will say that it is sad that new cars won’t ever have functional toggle switches in them like those old cars did.

(#feelconnectedtoyourcar)

Kinja'd!!! "RT" (rt-p)
05/07/2017 at 08:11, STARS: 0

Speaking of endless variations, there’s a Low Drag Speedster too…

Kinja'd!!!