by "MAXIMUMVRM" (maximumvrm)
Published 04/26/2017 at 20:01
by "MAXIMUMVRM" (maximumvrm)
Published 04/26/2017 at 20:01
No Tags
STARS: 0
Does this put the power to the ground??? I saw it’s from 2015 but my first time seeing it. Sick fun
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
"Die-Trying" (die-trying)
04/26/2017 at 20:39, STARS: 2
its putting it all down. 1200 hp should be running through the quarter a bit quicker.... the car weighs right at 2600 lbs without driver....... so if the guy weighs a little bit, say 200 lbs that would put the car weight in at 2800. he should be running through the lights at 7.73 at 174..... which it basically IS, if you get rid of his horrible reaction time 1.775. the 60 foot(1.57) says its STILL traction limited, even with awd.........
NICE CAR......
"Junkrat aka Rick Sanchez: Fury Road Edition" (realasabass)
04/26/2017 at 21:27, STARS: 2
That 60' is killing him. I wouldn’t say its all traction issues, he has a massive amount of lag.
"AdverseMartyr" (ewilliamson)
04/26/2017 at 21:46, STARS: 0
Unicorns and fairy dust.
"Die-Trying" (die-trying)
04/26/2017 at 21:50, STARS: 0
so is his reaction time........ but ,
yeah, he cant exactly do a good proper burn out with the awd. i gave the spot in the video where he is launching it another look, he is leaving at around 6500 on the tach...... around 1:04 in, shows his dyno power output. once it manages to spool, its getting after it.
"V8Demon - Prefers Autos for drag racing. Fite me!" (v8demon)
04/27/2017 at 05:43, STARS: 2
Reaction time is not part of the measured time in a quarter mile run.
"Die-Trying" (die-trying)
04/27/2017 at 14:52, STARS: 0
right,
heh, i had actually put the power and weight numbers in a 1/4 mile calculator, and it came up as 7.73 through the quarter at 174. IDEAL conditions, PERFECT traction.
i had gotten rid of something else i had thought to say, and it ended up worded awkwardly. still made sense to me when i had read it.... glad you guys are here to keep me on my toes......