by "The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock" (jukesjukesjukes)
Published 04/02/2017 at 16:38
by "The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock" (jukesjukesjukes)
Published 04/02/2017 at 16:38
No Tags
STARS: 0
Has this 2004 F150 RCSB, 4wd, 4.7 V8 (thought it was 5.4, I was wrong), 294,000kms.
They want $8,500cad for it, it appears to have a new exhaust too. The piping looks freshly bent. Here’s the dealer listing.
"Noah - Now with more boost." (antriebverliebt)
04/02/2017 at 16:41, STARS: 0
It’s practically a sports car compared to what they sell these days and doesn’t look 13 years old IMO! I will take this over the mural sized chrome grilles on 2017 trucks
"FTTOHG Has Moved to https://opposite-lock.com" (alphaass)
04/02/2017 at 16:44, STARS: 0
I think that’s a reasonable asking price if there isn’t any hidden rust. At a dealer around here with those miles, 4x4 and the 5.4 that would list between $7-8k US. You’d have to be crazy to actually pay that, but the dealer probably hopes to get around $7k CAD which is fair.
"The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock" (jukesjukesjukes)
04/02/2017 at 16:46, STARS: 1
It looks clean AF for almost 300,000km. The seat has minimal wear & the paint looks great for its age. It as some dents & scratches, but it’s 13 years old.
"Noah - Now with more boost." (antriebverliebt)
04/02/2017 at 16:49, STARS: 0
Yep especially for a Canadian car. I’m surprised that it still has all of it’s wheel arches lol.
"The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock" (jukesjukesjukes)
04/02/2017 at 16:52, STARS: 1
I saw some surface rust on the rear bumper, it was nothing major.
"Sampsonite24-Earth's Least Likeliest Hero" (sampsonite24)
04/02/2017 at 17:41, STARS: 0
I love those stepsides
"The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock" (jukesjukesjukes)
04/02/2017 at 17:42, STARS: 0
Me too. It be a great cheap truck.
"cluelessk" (cluelessk)
04/02/2017 at 17:56, STARS: 0
You want a 4.7 though?
No mileage advantage over the 5.4 and none of the power.
"The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock" (jukesjukesjukes)
04/02/2017 at 18:04, STARS: 0
It has a 4.7L.
"cluelessk" (cluelessk)
04/02/2017 at 18:22, STARS: 1
From everything I can find online there was actually no 4.7 in 2004 unless it’s a Dodge. (Not a Ford guy wasn’t sure of displacements)
You either have a 5.4, 4.6 or 4.2 V6. That being said. The smaller displacement engines won’t provide much if any better mpg with all the draw back that come with having a less power truck.
"The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock" (jukesjukesjukes)
04/02/2017 at 19:53, STARS: 0
I meant 4.6, my typing slipping off the “6".