by "Is my name good?, wants a BMW wagon" (apancake)
Published 04/01/2017 at 13:42
by "Is my name good?, wants a BMW wagon" (apancake)
Published 04/01/2017 at 13:42
No Tags
STARS: 0
.
"Nibby" (nibby68)
04/01/2017 at 13:50, STARS: 8
The distorting and confounding of all human and natural qualities, the fraternisation of impossibilities – the divine power of money – lies in its character as men’s estranged, alienating and self-disposing species-nature. Money is the alienated ability of mankind.
That which I am unable to do as a man , and of which therefore all my individual essential powers are incapable, I am able to do by means of money . Money thus turns each of these powers into something which in itself it is not – turns it, that is, into its contrary.
If I long for a particular dish or want to take the mail-coach because I am not strong enough to go by foot, money fetches me the dish and the mail-coach: that is, it converts my wishes from something in the realm of imagination, translates them from their meditated, imagined or desired existence into their sensuous, actual existence – from imagination to life, from imagined being into real being. In effecting this mediation, [money] is the truly creative power.
No doubt the demand also exists for him who has no money, but his demand is a mere thing of the imagination without effect or existence for me, for a third party, for the [others],||XLIII| and which therefore remains even for me unreal and objectless . The difference between effective demand based on money and ineffective demand based on my need, my passion, my wish, etc., is the difference between being and thinking , between that which exists within me merely as an idea and the idea which exists as a real object outside of me.
If I have no money for travel, I have no need – that is, no real and realisable need – to travel. If I have the vocation for study but no money for it, I have no vocation for study – that is, no effective , no true vocation. On the other hand, if I have really no vocation for study but have the will and the money for it, I have an effective vocation for it. Money as the external, universal medium and faculty (not springing from man as man or from human society as society) for turning an image into reality and reality into a mere image , transforms the real essential powers of man and nature into what are merely abstract notions and therefore imperfections and tormenting chimeras, just as it transforms real imperfections and chimeras – essential powers which are really impotent, which exist only in the imagination of the individual – into real powers and faculties. In the light of this characteristic alone, money is thus the general distorting of individualities which turns them into their opposite and confers contradictory attributes upon their attributes.
Money, then, appears as this distorting power both against the individual and against the bonds of society, etc., which claim to be entities in themselves. It transforms fidelity into infidelity, love into hate, hate into love, virtue into vice, vice into virtue, servant into master, master into servant, idiocy into intelligence, and intelligence into idiocy.
Since money, as the existing and active concept of value, confounds and confuses all things, it is the general confound ing and confusing of all things – the world upside-down – the confounding and confusing of all natural and human qualities.
He who can buy bravery is brave, though he be a coward. As money is not exchanged for any one specific quality, for any one specific thing, or for any particular human essential power, but for the entire objective world of man and nature, from the standpoint of its possessor it therefore serves to exchange every quality for every other, even contradictory, quality and object: it is the fraternisation of impossibilities. It makes contradictions embrace.
Assume man to be man and his relationship to the world to be a human one: then you can exchange love only for love, trust for trust, etc. If you want to enjoy art, you must be an artistically cultivated person; if you want to exercise influence over other people, you must be a person with a stimulating and encouraging effect on other people. Every one of your relations to man and to nature must be a specific expression, corresponding to the object of your will, of your real individual life. If you love without evoking love in return – that is, if your loving as loving does not produce reciprocal love; if through a living expression of yourself as a loving person you do not make yourself a beloved one, then your love is impotent – a misfortune.
"Dr. Zoidberg - RIP Oppo" (thetomselleck)
04/01/2017 at 14:37, STARS: 1
Not a car
"Chuckybas" (Chuckybas)
04/01/2017 at 14:51, STARS: 0
So You’re saying McLaren F1 LM?
I think you’re saying McLaren F1 LM.
"scoob" (scoobsti)
04/01/2017 at 14:57, STARS: 0
Yes
"If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent" (essextee)
04/01/2017 at 15:19, STARS: 2
If money wasn’t an object I guess it would just be a concept or sumthin
"macanamera" (macanamera)
04/01/2017 at 15:25, STARS: 1
^ Give me what he’s having
"Nibby" (nibby68)
04/01/2017 at 15:30, STARS: 0
You mean Karl Marx?
"G_Body_Man: Sponsored by the number 3" (gbodyman)
04/01/2017 at 15:45, STARS: 0
Shit, if money’s no object I want it all.
"SpeedSix" (speedsix)
04/01/2017 at 18:29, STARS: 0
Well, you can only have so many objects before you run out of space. Money, as a non-object, usually a number, can be accumulated beyond the storage capabilities of anyone’s lifestyle.