by "PS9" (PS9)
Published 02/25/2017 at 00:44
by "PS9" (PS9)
Published 02/25/2017 at 00:44
No Tags
STARS: 4
I be like; $70K FOR A CAR THAT IS FASTER THAN AN SLS GT IS TOO MUCH!?!?
"Birddog" (maintmgt)
02/25/2017 at 00:55, STARS: 3
It all depends on your value of $70,000.
70k can get me some acreage in Wisconsin that I can have fun on.
Or a Camaro.
I’ll take the land.
"PS9" (PS9)
02/25/2017 at 00:58, STARS: 3
You can’t take land to a race track.
"Birddog" (maintmgt)
02/25/2017 at 01:01, STARS: 3
True. But you can race on land.
"Discerning" (discerning2003c5z)
02/25/2017 at 01:05, STARS: 1
So what you’re saying is that 70k is too much for any car? Fair enough
"TheHondaBro" (wwaveform)
02/25/2017 at 01:05, STARS: 0
The GT-R costs $110,000 and it’s quicker than almost every other production car on the planet. Good deal?
"TheHondaBro" (wwaveform)
02/25/2017 at 01:06, STARS: 0
Bullshit.
"PS9" (PS9)
02/25/2017 at 01:10, STARS: 1
Front Page: No third petal? IT’S A PIECE OF SHIT I’M NOT PAYING SIX FIGURES FOR A NISSAN WHEN I CAN GET A CAYMAN WITH $60K IN OPTIONS ATTACHED
"TheHondaBro" (wwaveform)
02/25/2017 at 01:11, STARS: 1
FP: “The Civic is an overstyled mess!”
Also FP: “The Camero Z28 ZL1 Q5P 88GT ZHP SHO looks beautiful!!”
"RallyWrench" (rndlitebmw)
02/25/2017 at 01:12, STARS: 2
Yeah, these arguments are absurd. I mean, there are lots better ways to spend 70k than on a car, but if you’re going to, this one kicks about as much ass as possible for the money.
"CRider" (crider)
02/25/2017 at 01:21, STARS: 0
The NISMO GT-R costs $175k, though. The regular GT-R just doesn’t cut it any more.
"Birddog" (maintmgt)
02/25/2017 at 01:24, STARS: 0
I wouldn’t go that far. It’s a Friday and I’ve been thrinking©.
It’s a worthwhile machine but it’s most likely going to be a Shop Queen like most of the “special” cars built since the 1960s. We don’t have enough tracks for all these cars to matter. The tightest left turn I’ve ever made was the last turn off at Union Grove.
"PS9" (PS9)
02/25/2017 at 01:39, STARS: 0
Can’t take that to the track either.
"TheHondaBro" (wwaveform)
02/25/2017 at 01:41, STARS: 2
"PS9" (PS9)
02/25/2017 at 01:42, STARS: 0
You’re mean.
"Honeybunchesofgoats" (honeybunche0fgoats)
02/25/2017 at 08:08, STARS: 1
http://jalopnik.com/that-was-my-first-thought-too-i-thought-the-camaro-wa-1792735012
This whole discussion made me want to throw my phone.
“Camaros are supposed to be affordable performance!”
“You can get a 330 bhp Camaro for $28k”
“But $70k Camaros still exist! You’re not following”
"Nauraushaun" (nauraushaun12)
02/25/2017 at 08:08, STARS: 0
Fastness is overrated
"PS9" (PS9)
02/25/2017 at 08:19, STARS: 2
A roundabout way of saying he wants the Camaro to cost a certain amount PERIOD, no matter what it does or how it compares to other options on the market. A camaro with a warp core capable of intergalactic travel and integrated replicator and artificial gravity should still cost $28k or less. Seems fair to me! s/
"PS9" (PS9)
02/25/2017 at 08:29, STARS: 1
I’m not gonna listen to someone who’s name is 54% ‘an’!
"Dr. Zoidberg - RIP Oppo" (thetomselleck)
02/25/2017 at 08:58, STARS: 0
Not with that attitude.
"Jayhawk Jake" (jayhawkjake)
02/25/2017 at 09:29, STARS: 0
I don’t get what name has to do with price. If it was a new nameplate with this kind of performance there would be no negative reaction
"Jayhawk Jake" (jayhawkjake)
02/25/2017 at 09:30, STARS: 1
I don’t think the front page likes anything
"Jayhawk Jake" (jayhawkjake)
02/25/2017 at 09:33, STARS: 1
You can if you bring a jar
"Jayhawk Jake" (jayhawkjake)
02/25/2017 at 09:34, STARS: 0
Obviously not EVERYONE tracks these but I think you’d be surprised by how many actually get tracked.
"Nauraushaun" (nauraushaun12)
02/25/2017 at 16:09, STARS: 0
FINE!