by "CB" (jrcb)
Published 02/02/2017 at 14:29
by "CB" (jrcb)
Published 02/02/2017 at 14:29
Tags: Whoops
STARS: 3
Glad to see that the Canadian market version gets a V4! Which may or may not be factually incorrect. Either way, I dig it.
"Milky" (jordanmielke)
02/02/2017 at 14:37, STARS: 3
Is that .... is that from their website?
"WilliamsSW" (williamssw)
02/02/2017 at 14:38, STARS: 1
On the manufacturer’s own website, too?? Brilliant-
"spanfucker retire bitch" (lelykon)
02/02/2017 at 14:40, STARS: 0
That old N/A 2.5L V6 they replaced with the 2.0L turbo I4 might as well have been a V4.
"OpposResidentLexusGuy - USE20, XF20, XU30 and Press Cars" (jakeauern)
02/02/2017 at 14:44, STARS: 1
It’s correct. That’s a Turbo.
"HammerheadFistpunch" (hammerheadfistpunch)
02/02/2017 at 14:45, STARS: 0
Looks like some web editor will be moving to Cypurs Creek soon.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
"fintail" (fintail)
02/02/2017 at 14:52, STARS: 0
The relentless pursuit of perfection. And predator faces.
"404 - User No Longer Available" (toni-cipriani)
02/02/2017 at 15:30, STARS: 1
Most certainly is.
"WilliamsSW" (williamssw)
02/02/2017 at 15:35, STARS: 0
Why aren’t there more V4's, anyways? I’d think the manufacturers would love it for packaging - but it’s probably an NVH nightmare?
"404 - User No Longer Available" (toni-cipriani)
02/02/2017 at 15:42, STARS: 0
http://mechanics.stackexchange.com/questions/17282/why-did-v4-engines-never-take-off
TL;DR: complexity and refinement versus an Inline-4. And actually packaging would be a nightmare in traverse layouts.
"Aaron M - MasoFiST" (amarks563)
02/02/2017 at 15:49, STARS: 3
I should let my Dad know, he hasn’t owned a V4 since the 70s!
"TylerJ" (TylerJ)
02/02/2017 at 16:57, STARS: 0
When did Clavey start writing for Jalopnik?
"CB" (jrcb)
02/02/2017 at 17:09, STARS: 0
A few weeks ago.