by "Wobbles the Mind" (wobblesthemind)
Published 01/11/2017 at 10:17
by "Wobbles the Mind" (wobblesthemind)
Published 01/11/2017 at 10:17
Tags: Names
STARS: 0
Bet Jaguar is kicking themselves for not using “Project” before AMG. I think if Porsche can scare Aston Martin into using GT12 instead of GT3 then Jaguar should fight AMG for the use of Project.
"djmt1" (djmt1)
01/11/2017 at 10:22, STARS: 0
Project sounds like one of the words you shouldn’t be allowed to trademark.
"TheTurbochargedSquirrel" (thatsquirrel)
01/11/2017 at 10:24, STARS: 0
Um, Jaguar Project 7?
"Wobbles the Mind" (wobblesthemind)
01/11/2017 at 10:25, STARS: 0
Exactly why I think they should fight AMG over the use of Project One.
"Wobbles the Mind" (wobblesthemind)
01/11/2017 at 10:27, STARS: 0
What about “Concept” One or “Model” S?
"Rico" (ricorich)
01/11/2017 at 10:32, STARS: 0
But Project One is just the codename.
"djmt1" (djmt1)
01/11/2017 at 10:35, STARS: 0
Those too. Maybe Model [insert letter or number] might be fair game but then again you would think that with GT [insert number here].
"Wobbles the Mind" (wobblesthemind)
01/11/2017 at 10:39, STARS: 1
Don’t care, if they don’t say anything then it will become the name since what else is left? AMG RLR, AMG RS. “Project” could easily become an entire AMG shunkworks nomenclature like MSO. I say cut it off before it grows.
"Rico" (ricorich)
01/11/2017 at 11:15, STARS: 0
Idk nomenclature is pretty important to MB for them to waste it on something as anonymous as the word “Project”. Hell the AMG GT was codenamed C190 after the chassis design they definitely weren’t keeping that as the final name.